BlockFi Lending LLC $100 million penalty

Case Summary: BlockFi Lending LLC $100 Million Penalty

Issue: Did BlockFi Lending LLC engage in the sale of unregistered securities through its interest accounts, violating securities laws and consequently meriting a $100 million penalty?

Rule: The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940 require that offerings of securities to the public be registered with the SEC unless they qualify for an exemption. Securities must also provide necessary information to investors, and companies must adhere to regulatory standards governing investment companies.

Application: BlockFi Lending LLC offered and sold interest-bearing accounts without registering them as securities. Additionally, the company might not have adhered to the regulatory standards for investment companies.

Conclusion: BlockFi agreed to pay a $100 million penalty to settle the charges with the SEC and 32 states, acknowledging that they offered unregistered securities, thereby violating securities laws.

Detailed IRAC Outline:

I. Issue
A. The primary legal issue is whether BlockFi’s interest-bearing accounts constitute securities under federal law.
B. The secondary issue is whether BlockFi operated as an unregistered investment company.

II. Rule
A. Securities Definition
1. Investment Contract Analysis (Howey Test)
a. Investment of money
b. In a common enterprise
c. With an expectation of profits
d. To be derived from the efforts of others
B. Registration Requirements
1. Securities Exchange Act of 1934
2. Investment Company Act of 1940
C. Exemptions and Safe Harbors
1. Private offerings
2. Qualified institutional buyers
3. Accredited investors

III. Application
A. Facts Specific to BlockFi’s Interest Accounts as Securities
1. BlockFi offered accounts in which clients could deposit cryptocurrencies in exchange for interest payments, suggesting an investment of money.
2. The pooled deposits were used to fund various lending activities and investments, indicating a common enterprise.
3. Clients were promised a return on their deposits, constituting an expectation of profits.
4. Profits depended on BlockFi’s efforts in managing and investing the pooled funds.
B. Registration and Compliance Failures
1. BlockFi did not register the offering of these accounts with the SEC.
2. BlockFi did not provide full and fair disclosure as required for securities offerings.
3. BlockFi’s activities potentially placed it within the definition of an investment company, which should be registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
C. Actions Taken
1. The SEC conducted an investigation into BlockFi’s activities.
2. BlockFi cooperated with the investigation and ultimately agreed to the settlement.

IV. Conclusion
A. BlockFi’s interest accounts meet the definition of securities under the Howey Test.
B. BlockFi failed to register these securities or comply with investment company regulations.
C. The settlement of $100 million serves as a resolution to the charges and a deterrent for similar conduct in the industry.
D. Going forward, BlockFi and other similar businesses will be required to adhere to securities laws if offering products that function similarly to BlockFi’s interest accounts.

Discover more from Legal Three

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading