Former Coinbase Manager insider trading scheme

Brief Summary of the Case (IRAC Pattern)

Issue: The central issue is whether the former Coinbase manager engaged in insider trading by using confidential information about upcoming announcements of new cryptocurrency listings on the Coinbase exchange to profit from trades made before the information was publicly available.

Rule: Insider trading is prohibited under U.S. securities law, specifically by Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These laws make it illegal to trade a security based on material, nonpublic information in breach of a duty of trust and confidence.

Application: The application of the law depends on whether cryptocurrencies are considered securities, whether the manager owed a duty to Coinbase and its users, and whether the information used was material and non-public.

Conclusion: If cryptocurrencies are deemed to be securities, the manager’s actions could constitute insider trading. The conclusion would depend on the details of the case, such as the nature of the information and the manager’s role and responsibilities at Coinbase.

Detailed IRAC Outline of Relevant Facts and Discussion


  1. Whether the former Coinbase manager’s actions constitute insider trading.
  2. Determination of the status of cryptocurrencies as securities.
  3. The nature of the duty owed by the manager to Coinbase and its customers.
  4. The materiality and privacy of the information the manager had access to.


  1. Definition of insider trading under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 10(b), and Rule 10b-5.
  2. The Howey Test for determining whether an instrument qualifies as a security.
  3. Precedent cases that define duties of company insiders.
  4. Criteria for what constitutes material, non-public information.


  1. Examination of the manager’s role at Coinbase and access to sensitive information.
  2. Analysis of the timing and profitability of the trades in question.
  3. Evaluation of how announcements of cryptocurrency listings impact market prices.
  4. Comparison of the manager’s actions with the duties prescribed by their position.
  5. Consideration of whether the information was specifically about Coinbase as a company or about the cryptocurrencies themselves.
  6. Investigation of whether the manager disclosed the information or facilitated others to trade based on the information.


  1. A determination of insider trading would require cryptocurrencies to be classified as securities.
  2. If the manager breached a duty by using material, non-public information for personal gain, this would likely be deemed insider trading.
  3. The outcome would be contingent on the evidence of the manager’s intent, the materiality of the information, and the established legal definitions.

Detailed Discussion

The Manager’s Role and Duties
  • Outline the manager’s position at Coinbase and the level of access to sensitive information.
  • Discuss the fiduciary duties and confidentiality agreements associated with that role.
Nature of the Insider Information
  • Detail what specific information the manager had access to regarding new cryptocurrency listings.
  • Analyze whether this information could significantly influence Coinbase users’ trading decisions.
Timing and Execution of Trades
  • Sequence the events leading up to the announcements and the timing of the trades made.
  • Examine the correlation between the manager’s trades and the subsequent market movements once announcements were made public.
Impact on Market Prices
  • Present evidence of how prior listings have affected the prices of cryptocurrencies on Coinbase.
  • Discuss the predictability of such market movements based on past listings.
Intent and Knowledge
  • Explore communications or actions that suggest the manager was aware of the wrongdoing.
  • Look into whether the manager acted alone or colluded with others.
Legal Classifications and Precedent
  • Review the current legal stance on whether cryptocurrencies are considered securities.
  • Cite cases with similar circumstances that set a precedent for this situation.
Enforcement and Penalties
  • Discuss the potential consequences and penalties for insider trading in the context of cryptocurrency markets.
  • Consider the impact of the case on the regulation of digital assets and insider trading laws.

Discover more from Legal Three

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading